↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Developmental dyslexia and vision

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Developmental dyslexia and vision
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2013
DOI 10.2147/opth.s41607
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Quercia, Léonard Feiss, Carine Michel

Abstract

Developmental dyslexia affects almost 10% of school-aged children and represents a significant public health problem. Its etiology is unknown. The consistent presence of phonological difficulties combined with an inability to manipulate language sounds and the grapheme-phoneme conversion is widely acknowledged. Numerous scientific studies have also documented the presence of eye movement anomalies and deficits of perception of low contrast, low spatial frequency, and high frequency temporal visual information in dyslexics. Anomalies of visual attention with short visual attention spans have also been demonstrated in a large number of cases. Spatial orientation is also affected in dyslexics who manifest a preference for spatial attention to the right. This asymmetry may be so pronounced that it leads to a veritable neglect of space on the left side. The evaluation of treatments proposed to dyslexics whether speech or oriented towards the visual anomalies remains fragmentary. The advent of new explanatory theories, notably cerebellar, magnocellular, or proprioceptive, is an incentive for ophthalmologists to enter the world of multimodal cognition given the importance of the eye's visual input.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 115 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Other 11 9%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 20%
Psychology 22 17%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 30 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,215,579
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#139
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,987
of 204,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#3
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.