↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Glycyrrhizic acid nanoparticles inhibit LPS-induced inflammatory mediators in 264.7 mouse macrophages compared with unprocessed glycyrrhizic acid

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Glycyrrhizic acid nanoparticles inhibit LPS-induced inflammatory mediators in 264.7 mouse macrophages compared with unprocessed glycyrrhizic acid
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s37788
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Wang, Meng Luo, Yujie Fu, Song Wang, Thomas Efferth, Yuangang Zu

Abstract

Glycyrrhizic acid (GA), the main component of radix glycyrrhizae, has a variety of pharmacological activities. In the present study, suspensions of GA nanoparticles with the average particle size about 200 nm were prepared by a supercritical antisolvent (SAS) process. Comparative studies were undertaken using lipopolysaccardide (LPS)-stimulated mouse macrophages RAW 264.7 as in vitro inflammatory model. Several important inflammation mediators such as NO, PGE2, TNF-α and IL-6 were examined. These markers were highly stimulated by LPS and were inhibited both by nano-GA and unprocessed GA in a dose-dependent manner, especially PGE2 and TNF-α. However nano-GA and unprocessed GA inhibited NO only at a high concentration. In general, we found that GA nanoparticle suspensions exhibited much better anti-inflammatory activities compared to unprocessed GA.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 27 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 30%
Student > Master 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 20%
Chemistry 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 17%
Unspecified 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3,598
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,924
of 212,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#53
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.