The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Current protocols in the generation of pluripotent stem cells: theoretical, methodological and clinical considerations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem cells and cloning advances and applications, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.2147/sccaa.s8051 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brad B Swelstad, Candace L Kerr |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 25% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,324,041
of 26,414,132 outputs
Outputs from Stem cells and cloning advances and applications
#16
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,982
of 183,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem cells and cloning advances and applications
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,414,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them