Title |
Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: a review
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Women's Health, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijwh.s75637 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laura Londra, Farah S Chuong, Lisa Kolp |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 20% |
Unknown | 22 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 46% |
Psychology | 6 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,842,268
of 23,785,843 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#321
of 814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,969
of 286,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,785,843 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.