↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

In situ gelation properties of a collagen–genipin sol with a potential for the treatment of gastrointestinal ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 314)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
In situ gelation properties of a collagen–genipin sol with a potential for the treatment of gastrointestinal ulcers
Published in
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, December 2016
DOI 10.2147/mder.s116633
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takefumi Narita, Shunji Yunoki, Yoshimi Ohyabu, Naohisa Yahagi, Toshio Uraoka

Abstract

We investigated the potential of collagen-genipin sols as biomaterials for treating artificial ulcers following endoscopic submucosal dissection. Collagen sol viscosity increased with condensation, allowing retention on tilted ulcers before gelation and resulting in collagen gel deposition on whole ulcers. The 1.44% collagen sols containing genipin as a crosslinker retained sol fluidity at 23°C for >20 min, facilitating endoscopic use. Collagen sols formed gel depositions on artificial ulcers in response to body temperature, and high temperature responsiveness of gelation because of increased neutral phosphate buffer concentration allowed for thick gel deposition on tilted ulcers. Finally, histological observations showed infiltration of gels into submucosal layers. Taken together, the present data show that genipin-induced crosslinking significantly improves the mechanical properties of collagen gels even at low genipin concentrations of 0.2-1 mM, warranting the use of in situ gelling collagen-genipin sols for endoscopic treatments of gastrointestinal ulcers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Engineering 4 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 11%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 11 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,430,408
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#49
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,787
of 416,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.