The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
A systematic writing program as a tool in the grief process: part 1
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, December 2010
|
DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s14864 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bodil Furnes, Elin Dysvik |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 14 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Researcher | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 4 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,012,271
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#43
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,550
of 190,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.