↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Analysis of graded lesions in long-term carcinogenicity studies

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Medical Statistics, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of graded lesions in long-term carcinogenicity studies
Published in
Open Access Medical Statistics, May 2013
DOI 10.2147/oams.s43535
Authors

Jan Hamling, Fry, Peter Lee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Medical Statistics
#10
of 14 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,885
of 204,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Medical Statistics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.