↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Profile of once-daily zonisamide as monotherapy for treatment of partial seizures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Profile of once-daily zonisamide as monotherapy for treatment of partial seizures in adults
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, May 2013
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s43612
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Mula

Abstract

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurologic disorders, affecting about 50 million people around the world. It is recognized that around 50% of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy become seizure-free with the first drug treatment, so the choice of first antiepileptic drug is crucial. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of zonisamide as monotherapy for partial seizures, with special attention to the possibility of a once-daily regimen. The available data suggest that zonisamide is an effective and well tolerated option as monotherapy. Once-daily dosing is indicated, considering the long plasma half-life and linear pharmacokinetics of the drug. Zonisamide 300 mg was shown to be noninferior to carbamazepine 600 mg in terms of efficacy and safety, but even lower doses may be effective. Finally, the broad spectrum of efficacy in different seizure types, the low drug interaction potential, and the possibility of weight loss make zonisamide a preferred option in many epilepsy practices. Further data on monotherapy, especially in special populations, such as women of childbearing potential, are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 39%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Professor 3 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 19%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#1,416
of 2,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,885
of 204,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.