↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

JUND Promotes Tumorigenesis via Specifically Binding on Enhancers of Multiple Oncogenes in Cervical Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
JUND Promotes Tumorigenesis via Specifically Binding on Enhancers of Multiple Oncogenes in Cervical Cancer
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, May 2023
DOI 10.2147/ott.s405027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianlong Zhou, Juanmei Mo, Chaohui Tan, Feng Xie, Jing Liang, Wenhua Huang

Abstract

Enhancers are genomic regulatory elements located distally from the target gene, which play a critical role in determining cell identity and function. Dysregulation of enhancers has been frequently observed in various types of cancer, including cervical cancer. However, the identity of enhancers and their associated transcriptional regulators that are involved in cervical cancer remains unclear. With bioinformatics and 3D genomics, we revealed the enhancers in cervical cancer cell line and calculated which transcription factor (TF) is specifically binding on them based on TFs motif database. We knockdowned this TF and studied its function in cervical cancer cell line in vivo and in vitro. We found 14,826 activated enhancers and predicted that JUND (JunD Proto-Oncogene) is relatively enriched in the sequences of these enhancers. Well-known oncogene MYC and JUN were regulated by JUND through enhancers. To further explore the roles of JUND in cervical cancer, we analyzed the gene expression data of clinical cervical cancer samples and knock-downed JUND by CRISPR-Cas9 in Hela cell line. We found JUND is over-expressed in cervical cancer and the expression of JUND increased along with the cervical cancer progresses. Knockdown of JUND decreased the proliferation of Hela cells in vitro and in vivo and blocked cell cycle in G1-phase. Transcriptome sequencing analysis revealed the identification of 2,231 differentially expressed genes in response to the JUND knockdown treatment. This perturbation resulted in the modulation of several biological processes and pathways that have been previously linked to cancer. These findings provide evidence for the significant involvement of JUND in cervical cancer pathogenesis, thereby positioning JUND as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of this disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#21,328,996
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,612
of 3,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,335
of 397,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.