| Title |
Simple and Ultrasensitive Detection of Glioma-Related ctDNAs in Mice Serum by SERS-Based Catalytic Hairpin Assembly Signal Amplification Coupled with Magnetic Aggregation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s410080 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Youwei Wang, Yang Yang, Xiaowei Cao, Zhensheng Liu, Bing Chen, Qiu Du, Xiaoxia Lu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3,599
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#328,870
of 388,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#46
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.