↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Model of human aging: Recent findings on Werner’s and Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Model of human aging: Recent findings on Werner’s and Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndromes
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2008
DOI 10.2147/cia.s1957
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shian-ling Ding, Chen-Yang Shen

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms involved in human aging are complicated. Two progeria syndromes, Werner's syndrome (WS) and Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS), characterized by clinical features mimicking physiological aging at an early age, provide insights into the mechanisms of natural aging. Based on recent findings on WS and HGPS, we suggest a model of human aging. Human aging can be triggered by two main mechanisms, telomere shortening and DNA damage. In telomere-dependent aging, telomere shortening and dysfunction may lead to DNA damage responses which induce cellular senescence. In DNA damage-initiated aging, DNA damage accumulates, along with DNA repair deficiencies, resulting in genomic instability and accelerated cellular senescence. In addition, aging due to both mechanisms (DNA damage and telomere shortening) is strongly dependent on p53 status. These two mechanisms can also act cooperatively to increase the overall level ofgenomic instability, triggering the onset of human aging phenotypes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Germany 2 2%
India 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 101 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 22%
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 17 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,239,936
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#445
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,467
of 95,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.