| Title |
Techniques for fabrication and construction of three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s38635 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tingli Lu, Yuhui Li, Tao Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 807 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 796 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 166 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 161 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 112 | 14% |
| Researcher | 75 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 5% |
| Other | 72 | 9% |
| Unknown | 183 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 186 | 23% |
| Materials Science | 81 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 76 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 76 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 5% |
| Other | 129 | 16% |
| Unknown | 222 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,815,678
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#261
of 4,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,346
of 295,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#4
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.