| Title |
Lifestyle and nutrition, caloric restriction, mitochondrial health and hormones: Scientific interventions for anti-aging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s866 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luis Vitetta, Bill Anton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,381,869
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#367
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,275
of 168,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.