↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

New dilemmas in small-cell lung cancer TNM clinical staging

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
New dilemmas in small-cell lung cancer TNM clinical staging
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, May 2013
DOI 10.2147/ott.s44201
Pubmed ID
Authors

Konstantinos Zarogoulidis, Dimitrios Latsios, Konstantinos Porpodis, Paul Zarogoulidis, Kaid Darwiche, Nick Antoniou, Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt, Ellada Eleftheriadou, Efimia Boutsikou, Theodoros Kontakiotis

Abstract

Many patients with limited disease (LD) behave similarly to those with extensive disease (ED) from a prognostic point of view. On the other hand, a proportion of patients with ED small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) behave similarly to those with LD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 3 25%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 33%
Chemical Engineering 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2013.
All research outputs
#8,270,860
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#489
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,747
of 204,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#17
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.