↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

False sense of safety by daily QTc interval monitoring during methadone IVPCA titration in a patient with chronic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
False sense of safety by daily QTc interval monitoring during methadone IVPCA titration in a patient with chronic pain
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, May 2013
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s42487
Authors

Ricardo A. Cruciani, Miranda-Grajales, Hao

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Other 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 68%
Psychology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,339,860
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,382
of 1,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,825
of 192,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.