↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia: an update

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
439 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia: an update
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, September 2010
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s8550
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judi A Turner

Abstract

Pre-eclampsia is a significant, multifactorial, multiorgan disease affecting 5%-8% of all pregnancies in the US where it is the third leading cause of maternal mortality. Despite improvements in the diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia, severe complications can occur in both the mother and the fetus, and there is no effective method of prevention. Early detection and identification of pregnant women most at risk of developing the disease have proven challenging, but recent efforts combining biochemical and biophysical markers are promising. Efforts at prevention of pre-eclampsia with aspirin and calcium have had limited success, but research on modifiable risk factors, such as obesity surgery, are encouraging. Obstetric management of severe pre-eclampsia focuses on medical management of blood pressure and prevention of seizures using magnesium sulfate, but the ultimate cure remains delivery of the fetus and placenta. Timing of delivery depends on several factors, including gestational age, fetal lung maturity, and most importantly, disease severity. Anesthetic management includes regional anesthesia with careful evaluation of the patient's airway, volume status, and coagulation status to reduce morbidity and mortality. The potential complications of general anesthesia, including intracranial hemorrhage, in these patients make regional anesthesia the preferred choice in many cases. Nevertheless, it is important to be aware of the contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia and to prepare always for the possibility of encountering a difficult airway.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 427 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 15%
Student > Postgraduate 63 14%
Student > Bachelor 62 14%
Researcher 39 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 8%
Other 82 19%
Unknown 95 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 223 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 2%
Other 40 9%
Unknown 105 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,989,791
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#105
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,432
of 94,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.