↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease caused by periodontal pathogens

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease caused by periodontal pathogens
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, May 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s45929
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mesut Ogrendik

Abstract

A statistically significant association between periodontal disease (PD) and systemic diseases has been identified. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which is a chronic inflammatory joint disease, exhibits similar characteristics and pathogenesis to PD. The association between RA and PD has been investigated, and numerous publications on this subject exist. Approximately 20 bacterial species have been identified as periodontal pathogens, and these organisms are linked to various types of PD. The most analyzed species of periodontopathic bacteria are Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Tannerella forsythia, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Antibodies and DNA from these oral pathogens have been isolated from the sera and synovial fluids of RA patients. This rapid communication describes the role of periodontal pathogens in the etiopathogenesis of RA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Researcher 11 12%
Other 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,882,691
of 25,027,753 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#102
of 1,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,035
of 197,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,027,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.