↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Vitamin D deficiency and the risk of tuberculosis: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Vitamin D deficiency and the risk of tuberculosis: a meta-analysis
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, December 2016
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s79870
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shao-Jun Huang, Xian-Hua Wang, Zhi-Dong Liu, Wen-Li Cao, Yi Han, Ai-Guo Ma, Shao-Fa Xu

Abstract

To conduct meta-analyses of all published studies on various aspects of association between vitamin D and tuberculosis (TB). PubMed and Web of Knowledge were searched for all properly controlled studies on vitamin D and TB. Pooled odds ratio, mean difference or standardized mean difference, and its corresponding 95% confidence interval were calculated with the Cochrane Review Manager 5.3. A significantly lower vitamin D level was found in TB patients vs controls; vitamin D deficiency (VDD) was associated with an increased risk of TB, although such an association was lacking in the African population and in the human immunodeficiency virus-infected African population. A significantly lower vitamin D level was found in human immunodeficiency virus-TB-coinfected African patients receiving antiretroviral treatment who developed TB-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome vs those who did not develop TB-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. VDD was associated with an increased risk of developing active TB in those subjects with latent TB infection and with an increased risk of tuberculin skin test conversion/TB infection conversion, and the trend toward a lower vitamin D level in active TB patients vs latent TB infection subjects did not reach statistical significance, indicating that VDD was more likely a risk factor than a consequence of TB. This concept was further strengthened by our result that anti-TB treatment did not affect vitamin D level in TB patients receiving the treatment. Our analyses revealed an association between vitamin D and TB. VDD is more likely a risk factor for TB than its consequence. More studies are needed to determine whether vitamin D supplementation is beneficial to TB prevention and treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 203 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 17%
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Postgraduate 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 62 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 30%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 69 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,278,763
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#58
of 2,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,381
of 416,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.