↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Formulation and Evaluation of PLGA Nanoparticulate-Based Microneedle System for Potential Treatment of Neurological Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Formulation and Evaluation of PLGA Nanoparticulate-Based Microneedle System for Potential Treatment of Neurological Diseases
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2023
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s415728
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baohua Li, Geng Lu, Wenbin Liu, Liqi Liao, Junfeng Ban, Zhufen Lu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Unknown 6 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 6 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3,599
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,764
of 370,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#34
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.