| Title |
Self-reported interoceptive awareness in primary care patients with past or current low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s42418 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wolf E Mehling, Jennifer Daubenmier, Cynthia J Price, Mike Acree, Elizabeth Bartmess, Anita L Stewart |
| Abstract |
Mind-body interactions play a major role in the prognosis of chronic pain, and mind-body therapies such as meditation, yoga, Tai Chi, and Feldenkrais presumably provide benefits for pain patients. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) scales, designed to measure key aspects of mind-body interaction, were developed and validated with individuals practicing mind-body therapies, but have never been used in pain patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 238 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
| Researcher | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 20% |
| Unknown | 57 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 59 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 62 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2014.
All research outputs
#3,141,419
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#351
of 1,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,601
of 204,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.