↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Hürthle cell carcinoma: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 3,016)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Hürthle cell carcinoma: current perspectives
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, November 2016
DOI 10.2147/ott.s119980
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Ahmadi, Michael Stang, Xiaoyin “Sara” Jiang, Julie Ann Sosa

Abstract

Hürthle cell carcinoma (HCC) can present either as a minimally invasive or as a widely invasive tumor. HCC generally has a more aggressive clinical behavior compared with the other differentiated thyroid cancers, and it is associated with a higher rate of distant metastases. Minimally invasive HCC demonstrates much less aggressive behavior; lesions <4 cm can be treated with thyroid lobectomy alone, and without radioactive iodine (RAI). HCC has been observed to be less iodine-avid compared with other differentiated thyroid cancers; however, recent data have demonstrated improved survival with RAI use in patients with HCC >2 cm and those with nodal and distant metastases. Patients with localized iodine-resistant disease who are not candidates for a wait-and-watch approach can be treated with localized therapies. Systemic therapy is reserved for patients with progressive, widely metastatic HCC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 8 9%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 24 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,047,386
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#45
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,254
of 317,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#3
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.