| Title |
Patient knowledge on reporting adverse drug reactions in Poland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s117572 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Staniszewska, Marta Dąbrowska-Bender, Dominik Olejniczak, Aneta Duda-Zalewska, Magdalena Bujalska-Zadrożny |
| Abstract |
The aim of the study was to assess patient knowledge on reporting of adverse drug reactions. A prospective study was conducted among 200 patients. The study was based on an original survey composed of 15 single- and multiple-choice questions. The study involved individuals who have experienced adverse reactions as well as individuals who have never experienced any adverse reactions; people over the age of 18; literate; residing in Mazowieckie Voivodeship, who have not been diagnosed with any disease that could compromise their logical thinking skills. The respondents who lived in the city had a greater knowledge compared to the respondents who lived in the countryside (Pearson's χ(2)=47.70, P=0.0013). The respondents who lived in the city were also more statistically likely to provide a correct answer to the question about the type of adverse reactions to be reported (Pearson's χ(2)=50.66, P=0.012). Statistically significant associations were found between the place of residence of the respondents and the correct answer to the question about the data that must be included in the report on adverse reactions (Pearson's χ(2)=11.7, P<0.0001). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 14% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#846
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,189
of 416,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#18
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.