↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Efficacy and safety of 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and safety of 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2013
DOI 10.2147/opth.s43553
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Pacella, Pacella, Troisi, Dell'edera, Paolo Turchetti, Lenzi, Collini

Abstract

This randomized double-blind study examined the use of a new anesthetic agent, levobupivacaine 0.5%, which is the S(-)-enantiomer of a racemic mixture of bupivacaine, for peribulbar anesthesia and compared it with racemic bupivacaine 0.5% alone or in combination with hyaluronidase 10 IU/mL.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 30%
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Student > Master 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,836,214
of 12,488,808 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#707
of 1,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,631
of 147,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#43
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,488,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.