↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Efficacy and safety of 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and safety of 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2013
DOI 10.2147/opth.s43553
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Pacella, Fernanda Pacella, Fabiana Troisi, Domenico Dell’Edera, Paolo Tuchetti, Tommaso Lenzi, Saul Collini

Abstract

This randomized double-blind study examined the use of a new anesthetic agent, levobupivacaine 0.5%, which is the S(-)-enantiomer of a racemic mixture of bupivacaine, for peribulbar anesthesia and compared it with racemic bupivacaine 0.5% alone or in combination with hyaluronidase 10 IU/mL.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,803
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,685
of 204,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#29
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.