↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparing Virtual vs In-Person Immersive Leadership Training for Physicians

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Healthcare Leadership, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Comparing Virtual vs In-Person Immersive Leadership Training for Physicians
Published in
Journal of Healthcare Leadership, August 2023
DOI 10.2147/jhl.s411091
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia S P Fernandez, Caroline N Hays, Georgina Adatsi, Cheryl C Noble, Michelle Abel-Shoup, AnnaMarie Connolly

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#19,659,463
of 25,030,708 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Healthcare Leadership
#104
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,690
of 343,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Healthcare Leadership
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,030,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.