The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Determining the Superiority of Vitrectomy vs Aflibercept for Treating Dense Diabetic Vitreous Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2023
|
DOI | 10.2147/opth.s419478 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Miguel A Quiroz-Reyes, Erick Andrés Quiroz-Gonzalez, Miguel A Quiroz-Gonzalez, Virgilio Lima-Gómez |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Researcher | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#14,407,575
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#990
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,621
of 360,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#15
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.