↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Reasons for revision surgery after orbital decompression for Graves’ orbitopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Reasons for revision surgery after orbital decompression for Graves’ orbitopathy
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2008
DOI 10.2147/opth.s2416
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Sellari-Franceschini, Luca Muscatello, Veronica Seccia, Riccardo Lenzi, Amelia Santoro, Marco Nardi, Barbara Mazzi, Aldo Pinchera, Claudio Marcocci

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 90%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#820
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,974
of 97,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.