Title |
Cervical cancer risk factors and feasibility of visual inspection with acetic acid screening in Sudan
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Women's Health, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijwh.s14189 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ahmed Ibrahim, Vibeke Rasch, Eero Pukkala, Arja R Aro |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Myanmar | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 117 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 15% |
Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
Researcher | 9 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 18% |
Unknown | 39 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Unknown | 39 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,946,415
of 25,802,847 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#243
of 897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,564
of 121,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,802,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.