↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Race and Ethnic and Sex Differences in Rhythm Control Treatment of Incident Atrial Fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Race and Ethnic and Sex Differences in Rhythm Control Treatment of Incident Atrial Fibrillation
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, May 2023
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s402344
Pubmed ID
Authors

Larry R Jackson, Daniel J Friedman, Diane M Francis, Sonia Maccioni, Vincent C Thomas, Paul Coplan, Rahul Khanna, Charlene Wong, Neloufar Rahai, Jonathan P Piccini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Unspecified 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 36%
Unspecified 2 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,060,316
of 26,173,059 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#292
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,798
of 415,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,173,059 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.