| Title |
Reinfusion of ascites during hemodialysis as a treatment of massive refractory ascites and acute renal failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijnrd.s15792 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ta-Wei Hsu, Yi-Chuan Chen, Meei-Ju Wu, Anna Fen-Yau Li, Wu-Chang Yang, Yee-Yung Ng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 20% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2017.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#124
of 257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,104
of 193,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.