↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone: the evidence for its place in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Core Evidence, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone: the evidence for its place in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease
Published in
Core Evidence, December 2009
DOI 10.2147/ce.s7031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markos Poulopoulos, Cheryl Waters

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease. In the 1960s, it was shown that the degeneration of dopamine producing neurons in the substantia nigra (SN) caused the motor features of PD. Dopamine replacement with levodopa, a dopamine precursor, resulted in remarkable benefit. Yet, the intermittent administration of levodopa is a major cause of motor complications, such as "wearing-off" of levodopa's benefit and involuntary movements, known as dyskinesia. Therefore, agents that prolong levodopa's half-life were employed, such as carbidopa, an aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) inhibitor, and entacapone, a catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor. The combination product carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone (CLE) was approved in 2003 for the treatment of PD patients. To assess the evidence for the place of CLE in the treatment of PD. CLE has a good efficacy, safety and tolerability profile, similar to that of entacapone taken separately with carbidopa/levodopa (CL). Compared to CL alone, it prolongs levodopa's benefit, and improves the quality of life but not the motor performance in PD patients with nondebilitating "wearing-off" or dyskinesia. However, it increases the dyskinesia rate in early PD patients, and has adverse events in advanced patients with significant motor complications. There is insufficient evidence regarding cost-effectiveness. CLE is an attractive alternative for patients with nondisabling "wearing-off" or dyskinesia taking CL with or without entacapone. It cannot be recommended for early PD patients, as it can induce more dyskinesia than CL alone, or in any patients who seem to have more adverse events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 23%
Student > Postgraduate 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 23%
Neuroscience 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2023.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Core Evidence
#66
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,783
of 176,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Core Evidence
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.