↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Anthroposophic therapy for asthma: A two-year prospective cohort study in routine outpatient settings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asthma and Allergy, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Anthroposophic therapy for asthma: A two-year prospective cohort study in routine outpatient settings
Published in
Journal of Asthma and Allergy, November 2009
DOI 10.2147/jaa.s7184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harald J Hamre, Claudia M Witt, Gunver S Kienle, Christof Schnürer, Anja Glockmann, Renatus Ziegler, Stefan N Willich, Helmut Kiene

Abstract

Anthroposophic treatment for asthma includes special artistic and physical therapies and special medications. We studied consecutive outpatients starting anthroposophic treatment for asthma under routine conditions in Germany. Main outcomes were average asthma severity (0-10, primary outcome); symptoms (1-4); and asthma-related quality of life at 12-month follow-up (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [AQLQ] overall score, 1-7, for adults; KINDL Questionnaire for Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents, asthma module, 0-100, for children) at 12-month follow-up. Ninety patients (54 adults, 36 children) were included. Anthroposophic treatment modalities used were medications (88% of patients, n = 79/90); eurythmy therapy (22%); art therapy (10%); and rhythmical massage therapy (1%). Median number of eurythmy/art/massage sessions was 12 (interquartile range 10-20), median therapy duration was 120 days (84-184). From baseline to 12-month follow-up, all outcomes improved significantly (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Average improvements were: average asthma severity 2.61 points (95% confidence interval CI: 1.90-3.32); cough 0.93 (95% CI: 0.60-1.25); dyspnea 0.92 (95% CI: 0.56-1.28); exertion-induced symptoms 0.95 (95% CI: 0.64-1.25); frequency of asthma attacks 0.78 (95% CI: 0.41-1.14); awakening from asthma 0.90 (95% CI: 0.58-1.21); AQLQ overall score 1.44 (95% CI: 0.97-1.92); and KINDL asthma module 14.74 (95% CI: 9.70-19.78). All improvements were maintained until last follow-up after 24 months. Patients with asthma under anthroposophic treatment had long-term improvements of symptoms and quality of life.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,748,809
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#182
of 543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,969
of 108,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them