The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
A Physiotherapy-Led Transition to Home Intervention for Older Adults Following Emergency Department Discharge: A Pilot Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial (ED PLUS)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2023
|
DOI | 10.2147/cia.s413961 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mairéad Conneely, Siobhán Leahy, Margaret O’Connor, Gillian Corey, Ahmed Gabr, Anastasia Saleh, Blessing Okpaje, Íde O’ Shaughnessy, Aoife Synnott, Aoife McCarthy, Alison Holmes, Katie Robinson, Lorna Ryan, Anne Griffin, Louise Barry, Dominic Trépel, Damian Ryan, Rose Galvin, On behalf of Ageing Research Centre Public and Patient Involvement Panel of older adults |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 3 | 16% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 14 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
Scientists | 6 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
Librarian | 2 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 32 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 32 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,972,087
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#311
of 1,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,119
of 365,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.