| Title |
Clinicopathological Characteristics Related to Etiologies of Erythema Nodosum: A 10-Year Retrospective Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s343351 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Preeyachat Limtong, Poonkiat Suchonwanit, Kumutnart Chanprapaph, Suthinee Rutnin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 40% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,839,541
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#282
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,482
of 443,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.