Title |
Peripherally inserted central catheter thrombosis incidence and risk factors in cancer patients: a double-center prospective investigation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s73379 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuxiu Liu, Yufang Gao, Lili Wei, Weifen Chen, Xiaoyan Ma, Lei Song |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 18% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Researcher | 4 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 28% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 261. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#139,225
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#6
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,434
of 359,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.