| Title |
Can We Slow Down Biological Age Progression? Study Protocol for the proBNPage Reduction (PBAR) Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial (Effects of 4 “Anti-Aging” Food Supplements in Healthy Older Adults)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s422371 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio Muscari, Paola Forti, Mara Brizi, Donatella Magalotti, Eleonora Capelli, Simona Potì, Filomena Piro, Paolo Pandolfi, Vincenza Perlangeli, Eric Ramazzotti, Giovanni Barbara, On behalf of PBAR Study Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Andorra | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,945,554
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#634
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,734
of 358,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.