The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Effectiveness of Secretome from Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Gel (10% SM-hUCMSC Gel) for Chronic Wounds (Diabetic and Trophic Ulcer) – Phase 2 Clinical Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jmdh.s408162 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sukmawati Tansil Tan, Putri Bennya Aisyah, Yohanes Firmansyah, Nathasia Nathasia, Erwin Budi, Siufui Hendrawan |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 22% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2024.
All research outputs
#4,677,635
of 24,776,799 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#179
of 941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,986
of 370,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,776,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.