↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Immune Effects of Cryoablation in Woodchuck Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
Title
Immune Effects of Cryoablation in Woodchuck Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published in
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, November 2023
DOI 10.2147/jhc.s426442
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michal Mauda-Havakuk, Natalie M Hawken, Joshua W Owen, Andrew S Mikhail, Matthew F Starost, Baktiar Karim, Paul G Wakim, Olga L Franco-Mahecha, Andrew L Lewis, William F Pritchard, John W Karanian, Bradford J Wood

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#17,003,375
of 24,988,588 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
#92
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,372
of 315,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,988,588 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.