↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The clinical and economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the USA

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 514)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
458 Mendeley
Title
The clinical and economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the USA
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s34321
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony J Guarascio, Shauntá M Ray, Christopher K Finch, Timothy H Self

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third most common cause of death in the USA. In 2010, the cost of COPD in the USA was projected to be approximately US$50 billion, which includes $20 billion in indirect costs and $30 billion in direct health care expenditures. These costs can be expected to continue to rise with this progressive disease. Costs increase with increasing severity of disease, and hospital stays account for the majority of these costs. Patients are diagnosed with COPD following a multifactorial assessment that includes spirometry, clinical presentation, symptomatology, and risk factors. Smoking cessation interventions are the most influential factor in COPD management. The primary goal of chronic COPD management is stabilization of chronic disease and prevention of acute exacerbations. Bronchodilators are the mainstay of COPD therapy. Patients with few symptoms and low exacerbation risk should be treated with a short-acting bronchodilator as needed for breathlessness. Progression of symptoms, as well as possible decline in forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1), warrant the use of long-acting bronchodilators. For patients with frequent exacerbations with or without consistent symptoms, inhaled corticosteroids should be considered in addition to a long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) or long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and may even consist of "triple therapy" with all three agents with more severe disease. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors may be an option in patients with frequent exacerbations and symptoms of chronic bronchitis. In addition to a variety of novel ultra-LABAs, LAMAs and combination bronchodilator and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapies, other bronchodilators with a variety of mechanisms are also being considered, to expand therapeutic options for the treatment of COPD. With more than 50 new medications in the pipeline for the treatment of COPD, optimal management will continue to evolve and grow more complex as benefits of therapy are balanced with the limitations and needs of each patient.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 458 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 452 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 75 16%
Student > Master 67 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 10%
Student > Bachelor 48 10%
Other 40 9%
Other 80 17%
Unknown 100 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 133 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 9%
Engineering 24 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 5%
Other 97 21%
Unknown 117 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#581,946
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#18
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,074
of 206,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.