↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Differential effects of dosing regimen on the safety and efficacy of dasatinib: retrospective exposure–response analysis of a Phase III study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Differential effects of dosing regimen on the safety and efficacy of dasatinib: retrospective exposure–response analysis of a Phase III study
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/cpaa.s42796
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoning Wang, Amit Roy, Andreas Hochhaus, Hagop M Kantarjian, Tai-Tsang Chen, Neil P Shah

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 6 9%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#5,629,250
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#56
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,754
of 210,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.