↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Nanomedicine and cancer immunotherapy: focus on indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Nanomedicine and cancer immunotherapy: focus on indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase inhibitors
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, January 2017
DOI 10.2147/ott.s119362
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bilal Zulfiqar, Amnah Mahroo, Kaenat Nasir, Rai Khalid Farooq, Nasir Jalal, Muhammad Usman Rashid, Kashif Asghar

Abstract

Nanomedicine application in cancer immunotherapy is currently one of the most challenging areas in cancer therapeutic intervention. Innovative solutions have been provided by nanotechnology to deliver cytotoxic agents to the cancer cells partially affecting the healthy cells of the body during the process. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery is an emerging approach to stimulate the immune responses against cancer. The inhibition of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is a pivotal area of research in cancer immunotherapy. IDO is a heme-containing immunosuppressive enzyme, which is responsible for the degradation of tryptophan while increasing the concentration of kynurenine metabolites. Various preclinical studies showed that IDO inhibition in certain diseases may result in significant therapeutic effects. Here, we provide a review of the natural and synthetic inhibitors of IDO. These inhibitors are classified according to their source, inhibitory concentrations, the chemical structure, and the mechanism of action. Tumor-targeted chemotherapy is an advanced technique and has more advantages as compared to the conventional chemotherapy. Search for more efficient and less toxic nanoparticles in conjunction with compounds to inhibit IDO is still an area of interest for several research groups worldwide, especially revealing to be an extensive and a promising area in cancer therapeutic innovations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Chemistry 6 8%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 30 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2017.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#887
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,052
of 421,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#32
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.