↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Health economic evaluation of peritoneal dialysis based on cost-effectiveness in Japan: a preliminary study

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Health economic evaluation of peritoneal dialysis based on cost-effectiveness in Japan: a preliminary study
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, September 2019
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s212911
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomoyuki Takura, Makoto Hiramatsu, Hidetomo Nakamoto, Takahiro Kuragano, Jun Minakuchi, Hironori Ishida, Masaaki Nakayama, Susumu Takahashi, Hideki Kawanishi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 20%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#17,350,971
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#331
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,532
of 350,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.