↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Locally advanced rectal cancer: management challenges

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Locally advanced rectal cancer: management challenges
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/ott.s100806
Pubmed ID
Authors

RF Kokelaar, Evans, M Davies, DA Harris, J Beynon

Abstract

Between 5% and 10% of patients with rectal cancer present with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), and 10% of rectal cancers recur after surgery, of which half are limited to locoregional disease only (locally recurrent rectal cancer). Exenterative surgery offers the best long-term outcomes for patients with LARC and locally recurrent rectal cancer so long as a complete (R0) resection is achieved. Accurate preoperative multimodal staging is crucial in assessing the potential operability of advanced rectal tumors, and resectability may be enhanced with neoadjuvant therapies. Unfortunately, surgical options are limited when the tumor involves the lateral pelvic sidewall or high sacrum due to the technical challenges of achieving histological clearance, and must be balanced against the high morbidity associated with resection of the bony pelvis and significant lymphovascular structures. This group of patients is usually treated palliatively and subsequently survival is poor, which has led surgeons to seek innovative new solutions, as well as revisit previously discarded radical approaches. A small number of centers are pioneering new techniques for resection of beyond-total mesorectal excision tumors, including en bloc resections of the sciatic notch and composite resections of the first two sacral vertebrae. Despite limited experience, these new techniques offer the potential for radical treatment of previously inoperable tumors. This narrative review sets out the challenges facing the management of LARCs and discusses evolving management options.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Other 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 55%
Unspecified 2 5%
Mathematics 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 26%