↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Profile of tivozanib and its potential for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Profile of tivozanib and its potential for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s31442
Pubmed ID
Authors

C Lance Cowey

Abstract

Tivozanib is a novel vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGF TKI). Among other VEGF TKIs, tivozanib stands apart due to its selective kinase inhibitory properties as well as its high potency for inhibiting VEGF receptors 1 and 2. Tivozanib has been evaluated in several clinical trials including a Phase I and Phase II trial demonstrating safety and efficacy for patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A pivotal randomized Phase III trial comparing the front-line use of tivozanib to sorafenib in patients with metastatic clear cell RCC has been reported. The clinical development of tivozanib and results of these important studies will be reviewed. Also, the potential placement of tivozanib among currently US Food and Drug Administration approved agents for advanced RCC will be discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 38%
Other 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,284,242
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#345
of 2,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,186
of 207,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.