↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Parity association with clinicopathological factors in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective analysis

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Parity association with clinicopathological factors in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective analysis
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, January 2017
DOI 10.2147/ott.s123888
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandi Shen, Shizhen Zhong, Gaofang Xiao, Haibo Zhou, Wenhua Huang

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between parity and age at diagnosis, primary tumor size, axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis, histological grade, and subtype classification in patients with breast cancer. Data from 392 patients with invasive breast cancer were collected and divided into four groups: nulliparous (parity 0), parity 1, parity 2, and parity ≥3. The relationship between parity and age at diagnosis was assessed using post hoc Dunnett's T3 test, and tumor size, the number of ALN metastases, and histological grade were analyzed using Spearman's rho test. Breast cancer subtypes were analyzed using the chi-square (χ(2)) test. The results showed that the mean age at diagnosis increased with increased parity, and the mean age of patients with parity ≥3 was significantly greater than that of patients with parity 0, parity 1, and parity 2. The mean age at diagnosis of patients with parity 2 was greater than that of patients with parity 1. There was no significant difference in the mean age between patients with parity 0 and parity 1 or parity 0 and parity 2. Parity was negatively correlated with ALN metastasis. Parity was not correlated with tumor size or histological grade and the proportion of the four subtypes in breast cancer. So, increased parity deferred the onset of breast cancer and inhibited the metastasis of ALN, but did not affect tumor size, histological grade, or the proportion of subtypes. Increased parity was a protective factor against breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Researcher 2 9%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 9 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 35%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2017.
All research outputs
#20,110,957
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,438
of 2,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,813
of 422,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#47
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,967 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.