↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Patient health information materials in waiting rooms of family physicians: do patients care?

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Patient health information materials in waiting rooms of family physicians: do patients care?
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s45777
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tania Moerenhout, Liesbeth Borgermans, Sandrina Schol, Johan Vansintejan, Erwin Van De Vijver, Dirk Devroey

Abstract

Patient health information materials (PHIMs), such as leaflets and posters are widely used by family physicians to reinforce or illustrate information, and to remind people of information received previously. This facilitates improved health-related knowledge and self-management by patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
Unknown 74 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 22%
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 15%
Psychology 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,199,565
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#499
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,724
of 206,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#11
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.