| Title |
Electronic brachytherapy as adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer: a retrospective analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
OncoTargets and therapy, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ott.s15297 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William C Dooley, James C Wurzer, Mohamed Megahy, Gary Schreiber, Tapan Roy, Gary Proulx, Susan Laduzinsky, Steven Lane, James Dalzell, Kambiz Dowlatshahi, Dwelvin Simmons, John P Thropay, Harish Ahuja, Peter Beitsch, Randall W Holt, Charles A Lee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 23% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,713,411
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#564
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,663
of 192,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them