↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Use of the CPRD Aurum Database: Insights Gained from New Data Quality Assessments

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Use of the CPRD Aurum Database: Insights Gained from New Data Quality Assessments
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, December 2023
DOI 10.2147/clep.s434832
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Jick, Catherine Vasilakis-Scaramozza, Rebecca Persson, David Neasham, George Kafatos, Katrina Wilcox Hagberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#19,687,357
of 25,066,230 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#597
of 783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,324
of 260,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,066,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.