↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparing coding between interventional radiologists and hospital coding departments

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Audit, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Comparing coding between interventional radiologists and hospital coding departments
Published in
Clinical Audit, May 2010
DOI 10.2147/ca.s9634
Authors

J Cox

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Other 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 75%
Decision Sciences 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,737,861
of 23,878,717 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Audit
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,503
of 97,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Audit
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,878,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them