| Title |
Distal Nasal Part of the Visual Field and RNFL in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s444057 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Lestak, Martin Fůs, Sarka Pitrova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,877,804
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2,615
of 3,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,734
of 349,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#28
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.