↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Nanomaterials in the application of tumor vaccines: advantages and disadvantages

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Nanomaterials in the application of tumor vaccines: advantages and disadvantages
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/ott.s41902
Pubmed ID
Authors

XD Li, JY Gao, Y Yang, HY Fang, YJ Han, XM Wang, W Ge

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 10%
Engineering 6 10%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2015.
All research outputs
#17,438,425
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,145
of 2,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,962
of 206,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#22
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,967 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.